Firearms: imitation firearms: gun-shaped phone cases.
Summary
Existing federal law prohibits a person from manufacturing, entering into commerce, shipping, transporting, or receiving any toy, look-alike, or imitation firearm unless the firearm contains, or has affixed to it, a marking approved by the federal Secretary of Commerce. Existing state law defines "imitation firearm" as any BB device, toy gun, replica of a firearm, or other device that is so substantially similar in coloration and overall appearance to an existing firearm as to lead a reasonable person to perceive that the device is a firearm. Under existing law, a manufacturer, importer, or distributor of imitation firearms that, among other things, fails to comply with any applicable federal law or regulation governing the marking of a toy, look-alike, or imitation firearm, as defined by federal law or regulation, is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would specify that the definition of imitation firearm described above includes, but is not limited to, a protective case for a cellular telephone that is so substantially similar in coloration and overall appearance to an existing firearm as to lead a reasonable person to perceive that the device is a firearm.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Mar 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 8, 2016
Signed Aug 26, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2016 · Assembly Mar 28, 2016
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Aug 11, 2016
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Aug 26, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 11, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-2)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 22, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 21).
upper
May 25, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 19, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 7, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-4)
assembly
Mar 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 15).
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 9, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1798
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1798. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline