Contractors: license requirements: recovery actions.
Summary
Existing law, the Contractors' State License Law, creates the Contractors' State License Board within the Department of Consumer Affairs and provides for the licensure and regulation of contractors. Existing law authorizes a person who utilizes an unlicensed contractor to bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state for recovery of compensation paid to the unlicensed contractor for performance of any act or contract. Existing law authorizes a court to determine that a contractor has substantially complied with licensure requirements if specified conditions are met, including that the contractor did not know or should not reasonably have known, that he or she was not duly licensed when the performance under the contract occurred. Existing law also requires a contractor to demonstrate that he or she acted promptly and in good faith to reinstate his or her license upon learning it was invalid in order to meet substantial compliance of these licensure requirements. This bill would revise certain of the criteria for a court to find that a contractor is in substantial compliance with the licensure requirements, including removing the condition that the contractor did not know or should not have reasonably have known, that he or she was unlicensed during performance of the contract.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 4, 2016
Signed Aug 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2016 · Assembly Aug 15, 2016
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Aug 11, 2016
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Aug 30, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 15, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0-2)
assembly
Aug 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5809.).
lower
Aug 11, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-2)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 20, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 6, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 6). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.
upper
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 3, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 26, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 19, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 5, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1793
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1793. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline