Franchises: offer to sell: trade show.
Summary
The Franchise Investment Law generally requires a franchisor to register with the Department of Business Oversight before an offer or sale of a franchise in this state and provides that a willful violation of this law is a crime. Existing law provides, among other things, that an offer or sale of a franchise is made in this state when an offer to sell is made in this state, or an offer to buy is accepted in this state, or, if the franchisee is domiciled in this state, the franchised business is or will be operated in this state. Existing law provides that an offer to sell is not made in this state merely because a radio or television program originating outside this state is received in this state. This bill would provide, until January 1, 2020, that an offer to sell is not made in this state merely because a prospective franchisor, or a franchisor who is not then offering a franchise for sale in California and has not registered an offering under the Franchise Investment Law, secures a space at a franchise trade show from which it offers information about its products, services, or system to the general public under specified circumstances, including, among others, the payment of a fee. The bill would also define a franchise trade show for purposes of the Franchise Investment Law.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 4, 2016
Vetoed Sep 22, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2016 · Assembly Aug 29, 2016
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
Aug 23, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Sep 22, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 29, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Aug 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6360.).
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Apr 6, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 14, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 7, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 5, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1782
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1782. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline