Tribal gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude tribal-state gaming compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the amendment to the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Jackson Rancheria Band of Miwuk Indians, executed on June 22, 2016. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions related to that amended compact are not projects for purposes of CEQA. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 3, 2016
Signed Sep 12, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2016 · Assembly May 19, 2016
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Aug 17, 2016
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 12, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2016
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6141.).
lower
Aug 17, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
Aug 17, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 9, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 30, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 28, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 26, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 19, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-4)
assembly
May 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1767
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1767. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline