AB 1766 California Assembly · 2015-2016 Regular Session

Examination of prospective jurors.

Summary
(1) In civil trials, existing law requires a trial judge to examine prospective jurors, and, upon completion of the judge's examination, grants counsel for each party the right to examine, by oral and direct questioning, any prospective juror in order to enable counsel to intelligently exercise peremptory challenges and challenges for cause. Existing law provides that the judge in civil trials should provide the parties with both the alphabetical list and the list of prospective jurors in the order in which they will be called. This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) Under existing law, which was enacted by initiative measure, in a criminal case, the court is required to conduct the examination of prospective jurors, except that the court may permit the parties, upon a showing of good cause, to conduct a further inquiry. The initiative measure provides that it may be amended by a measure enacted by a 23 vote of each house. This bill would, until January 1, 2022, in criminal trials, require the court to provide the complete names of prospective jurors to counsel for each party, as specified. The bill would also require the court and counsel for each party to address a prospective juror using a number assigned by the court, by the prospective juror's first name and first initial of his or her last name, or by his or her title and last name, as determined by the court in each criminal trial. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 3, 2016 Vetoed Aug 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2016 · Assembly Apr 4, 2016

How they voted

32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Aug 11, 2016
D Democratic24
22 Yea 2
91% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Aug 30, 2016
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Aug 29, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5808.).
lower
Aug 11, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 4, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-1)
assembly
Mar 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Mar 29, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 29).
lower
Mar 10, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 7, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 1, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mark Stone
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
CA
29