Human trafficking: victims: vacating convictions.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, as amended by Proposition 35, an initiative measure approved by the voters at the November 6, 2012, statewide general election, a person who deprives or violate another person's personal liberty with the intent to obtain forced labor or services or who deprives or violates another person's personal liberty for the purpose of prostitution or sexual exploitation is guilty of human trafficking, a felony. Proposition 35 provides that it may be amended by a statute in furtherance of its objectives by a majority of the membership of each house of the Legislature concurring. Existing law allows a court to issue an order to set aside a verdict of guilty and dismiss an accusation or information against a defendant who has been convicted of solicitation or prostitution if the defendant has completed any term of probation for that conviction and if he or she can establish by clear and convincing evidence that the conviction was a result of his or her status as a victim of human trafficking. This bill would instead allow an individual convicted of a nonviolent crime that was a direct result of the individual being a human trafficking victim to apply to the court to vacate the conviction if the individual is not then in custody and has either not been convicted of any crime for two years or has successfully completed probation for the crime. The bill would allow an individual adjudicated a ward of the juvenile court as the result of a nonviolent crime committed while he or she was a human trafficking victim to apply to have the petition dismissed if the individual has not had a sustained petition for any crime or been convicted of any crime for one year prior to the date of application. The bill would specify various court procedures for adjudication of an application. If the application is granted, the bill would require the court to have all records in the case sealed, except as specified, and to release the defendant from all penalties and disabilities, as provided. The bill would define "human trafficking victim" and "nonviolent crime" for these purposes. The bill would require the individual applying for vacatur to submit the application and all evidence in support of the application under penalty of perjury. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires the Attorney General to compile and disseminate state summary criminal history information pertaining to the identification and criminal history of any person. This bill would require the state summary criminal history information to exclude any charge or conviction for which relief has been granted pursuant to the provisions of this bill. (3) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 8712 of the Family Code, proposed by AB 1997, that would become operative only if this bill and AB 1997 are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 2, 2016
Vetoed Sep 26, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2016 · Assembly Jun 3, 2016
How they voted
23–8
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 33
Aug 23, 2016
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
7
Sep 26, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 6399.).
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-8-2)
senate
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 3, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-17-8)
assembly
May 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 27, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 11, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 6, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 5, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 4, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 29).
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 3, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Co
Miguel Santiago
DDemocratic
Co
Shirley N. Weber
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1762
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1762. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline