Mining claims: recording.
Summary
Existing law requires, whenever labor is performed, improvements are made, or a maintenance fee is paid on a mining claim, that a specified affidavit be recorded in the county in which the mining claim is situated. Existing law requires that affidavit to include, among other things, the names, current mailing addresses, and current residential addresses of the person who makes the proof and the owner of the claim. Existing law requires the recorder of each county to accept for recordation any instrument, paper, or notice that is authorized or required by law to be recorded. Existing law requires those documents, except as otherwise provided by another law or regulation, to comply with specified standards respecting margins, quality of paper, print size and color, and other related matters. This bill would no longer require the recorded mining claim affidavit to include the current residential addresses of the person who makes the proof and the owner of the claim.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Mar 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Jul 2016
Introduced Feb 1, 2016
Signed Jul 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 30, 2016 · Assembly Mar 28, 2016
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jun 30, 2016
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Jul 25, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 30, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jun 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 14, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
Apr 7, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-4)
assembly
Mar 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 14).
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 2, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1734
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1734. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline