Civil damages.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the plaintiff, in an action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, when it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, to recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant in addition to the actual damages. Existing law authorizes the court, for good cause, to grant a defendant a protective order requiring the plaintiff to produce evidence of a prima facie case of liability for exemplary damages prior to the introduction of certain evidence. This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to those provisions.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 28, 2016
Last action Jan 29, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
2
Key actions
1
Committee
1
Jan 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1728
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1728. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline