Vehicles: automated traffic enforcement systems.
Summary
Existing law defines an "official traffic control signal" as any device, whether manually, electrically, or mechanically operated, by which traffic is alternately directed to stop and proceed and which is erected by authority of a public body or official having jurisdiction. Existing law states that any required stop be made at a sign, crosswalk, or limit line indicating where the stop is to be made, but, in the absence of that sign or marking, existing law requires that the stop be made at the official traffic control signal. This bill would expressly state that a stop is required to be made at an official traffic control signal erected and maintained at a freeway or highway on ramp. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Mar 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 28, 2016
Last action Aug 11, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Mar 28, 2016
How they voted
67–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 71
Mar 28, 2016
D
Democratic46
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
4
Committee
9
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 7, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-4)
assembly
Mar 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (March 14).
lower
Mar 8, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jan 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1725
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1725. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline