Healing arts: behavior analysis: licensing.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various healing arts licensees by various boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs, including the Board of Psychology. Under existing law, until January 1, 2017, the board is vested with the power to enforce the Psychology Licensing Law, and the board consists of 9 members, 4 of whom are public members and 5 of whom are licensed psychologists. Existing law specifies that a quorum of the board requires 5 members. Existing law requires the board to post information on its licensees, including the license status and address of record for a licensee, as specified. This bill would enact the Behavior Analyst Act and would, until January 1, 2022, vest the board with the power to enforce the act. This bill would, on and after July 1, 2018, increase the number of members that constitute a quorum of the board to 6 members, and would require the Governor to appoint 2 additional members to the board that meet certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that one member is licensed as a psychologist and is qualified to practice behavior analysis, as defined. The bill would also additionally require the board to post license information regarding behavior analysts, assistant behavior analysts, behavior analysis technicians, and behavior analyst interns. This bill would require a person to apply for and obtain a license from the board prior to engaging in the practice of behavior analysis, as defined, either as a behavior analyst or an assistant behavior analyst. The bill would require these applicants to, among other things, meet certain educational and training requirements, and pass a specified state and federal criminal background check. The bill would require an assistant behavior analyst applicant to provide proof to the board of ongoing supervision by a licensed behavior analyst or a licensed psychologist who is qualified to practice behavior analysis, as specified. The bill would provide that those licenses expire 2 years after the date of issuance and would authorize the renewal of unexpired licenses if certain requirements are met, including the completion of specified continuing education. The bill would also require an applicant for relicensure or reinstatement to certify, under penalty of perjury, that he or she is in compliance with that continuing education requirement. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the registration of a behavior analyst intern by the board and would require the intern to be supervised by a licensed behavior analyst or a licensed psychologist who is qualified to practice behavior analysis. In order to be registered, the bill would require an intern applicant to meet certain educational requirements, pass a specified state and federal criminal background check, and pay an application fee, as provided. The bill would make these intern registrations subject to renewal every 2 years and would require the payment of a renewal fee. This bill would also require the registration of a behavior analysis technician, as defined, who practices under the direction and supervision of a registered behavioral analyst intern, a licensed behavior analyst, a licensed assistant behavior analyst, or a licensed psychologist who is qualified to practice behavior analysis. The bill, among other things, would require that technician to submit an application, pass a specified state and federal criminal background check, and pay an application fee. The bill would make these registrations subject to renewal every 2 years and would require the payment of a renewal fee. This bill would, until January 1, 2022, create the Behavior Analyst Committee within the jurisdiction of the board, and would require the committee to be composed of 5 members who shall be appointed as specified. The bill would authorize the committee to make recommendations to the board regarding the regulation of the practice of behavior analysis, as provided. This bill would require the board to conduct disciplinary hearings, as specified. The bill, on and after July 1, 2019, would make it unlawful to, among other things, practice behavior analysis without being licensed by the board, except as specified. This bill would make a licensee or health care facility, as defined, that fails or refuses to comply with an authorized client request or court order for the medical records of a client subject to a specified civil penalty, except as specified. The bill would also make a licensee or health care facility with multiple violations of those court orders subject to a crime. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make a violation of the act a misdemeanor punishable by 6 months in the county jail or a fine not to exceed $2,000, or by both imprisonment and a fine. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 26, 2016
Last action Jun 21, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2016
How they voted
69–4
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 78
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic52
100% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican25
64% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Jun 21, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 1, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-4-5)
assembly
May 27, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (May 27).
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 5).
lower
Mar 30, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Jan 27, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1715
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1715. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline