Vehicular air pollution: zero-emission vehicles: civil penalties.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt and implement standards for the control of emissions from new motor vehicles that the state board finds to be necessary and technologically feasible. Existing law prohibits a new motor vehicle from being sold in the state that does not meet the emissions standards adopted by the state board. Existing law provides that a person who violates specified vehicular air pollution statutes or specified orders, rules, or regulations of the state board is subject to a civil penalty of up to $500 per vehicle. Existing law provides that any manufacturer who sells, attempts to sell, or causes to be offered for sale a new motor vehicle that fails to meet the applicable emission standards is subject to a civil penalty of $5,000 per violation. Existing law provides that a manufacturer or distributor who does not comply with the emission standards or the test procedures adopted by the state board is subject to a civil penalty of $50 per vehicle. This bill would increase those penalties to up to $37,500 per violation. The bill would require the state board to adjust those maximum penalties for inflation, as specified, and would exempt those adjustments from the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill would authorize the state board to require the payment of a penalty for the violation of specified vehicular air pollution statutes or specified orders, rules, or regulations of the state board, and making the products compliant with specified laws, as conditions for the continued sale of those products. This bill would authorize the state board to order a manufacturer of motor vehicles to bring the vehicles into compliance with the emissions configuration to which they were certified. The bill would authorize the state board to require the manufacturer to be in compliance with the state board's order as a condition for the continued sale of motor vehicles in the state. (2) Existing law prohibits a person who is a state resident or who operates an established place of business within the state from importing, delivering, purchasing, renting, leasing, acquiring, or receiving a new motor vehicle, new motor vehicle engine, or motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle engine for use, registration, or resale in the state unless the motor vehicle engine or new motor vehicle has been certified to meet specified emissions standards. Existing law provides that a person who violates specified provisions relating to transactions of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines is subject to a civil penalty of up to $5,000 per vehicle. This bill instead would prohibit any person from offering for sale, introducing into commerce, importing, delivering, purchasing, renting, leasing, acquiring, or receiving a new motor vehicle, new motor vehicle engine, or motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle engine for use, registration, or resale in the state unless the motor vehicle engine or new motor vehicle has been certified to meet those specified emissions standards. This bill would increase the civil penalty to up to $37,500 per violation and up to $10,000 for a dealer, as defined, for violating those specified provisions relating to transactions of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines. The bill would require the state board to adjust those maximum penalties for inflation, as specified, and would exempt those adjustments from the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill would authorize the state board to require the payment of the penalty, and making the motor vehicles compliant with specified laws, as conditions for the continued or further sale in the state of those motor vehicles. This bill would require the state board to limit to $5,000 a specified civil penalty imposed on a manufacturer who does not meet the requirements of specified regulations that require manufacturers to have a specified percentage of their new motor vehicle sales be zero-emission vehicles.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Jan 20, 2016
Signed Sep 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2016 · Assembly May 12, 2016
How they voted
24–10
Passed
Total votes 34
Aug 24, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
7
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 6436.).
lower
Aug 25, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-10)
senate
Aug 8, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 2, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 14, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 8, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on T. & H. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q., T. & H. and JUD.
upper
May 12, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-26-3)
assembly
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 19, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 12, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jan 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jimmy Gomez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1685
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1685. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline