Traffic controls: Kern County pilot project.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways and associated property. Existing law defines "official traffic control device" as any sign, signal, marking, or device placed by authority of a public body having jurisdiction, for the purpose of regulating, warning, or guiding traffic, with certain exceptions. Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to the Vehicle Code. Existing law authorizes a local agency to adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution to regulate traffic by means of official traffic control devices, but generally limited to a highway that is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the local agency, unless the Department of Transportation gives written approval to the application of the ordinance or resolution to a state highway. This bill would, until January 1, 2022, establish a pilot project in Kern County that would require the Department of Transportation to obtain the approval of the Kern Council of Governments prior to installing an official traffic control device or a roundabout on a state highway within Kern County, as specified. The requirements of the bill would not apply to freeways. By requiring local agencies to approve proposed actions of the Department of Transportation, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 7, 2016
Last action Jun 29, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 28, 2016
How they voted
48–24
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 75
Apr 28, 2016
D
Democratic50
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican24
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
2
Committee
5
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
May 5, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-24-3)
assembly
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Feb 1, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jan 8, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Phil Ting
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1638
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1638. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline