Public social services omnibus.
Summary
(1) Existing federal law, the Immigration and Nationality Act, establishes a procedure for classification of certain aliens as special immigrants who have been declared dependent on a juvenile court and authorizes those aliens to apply for an adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident within the United States. Under federal regulations, an alien is eligible for special immigrant juvenile status if, among other things, he or she is under 21 years of age. Existing state law provides that the juvenile, probate, and family divisions of the superior court have jurisdiction to make judicial determinations regarding the custody and care of children within the meaning of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act. This bill would clarify that the court has jurisdiction to make the factual findings necessary to enable a child to petition the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for classification as a special immigrant juvenile. The bill would also provide that the factual findings may be made at any point in a proceeding, as specified, if certain requirements are met. (2) Existing law requires the court, upon request, to make the necessary findings regarding special immigrant juvenile status if there is evidence to support those findings, which may consist of, but is not limited to, a declaration by the child who is the subject of the petition. Existing law also authorizes the court to make additional findings that are supported by evidence if requested by a party. This bill would specify that the evidence to support those findings may consist solely of, but is not limited to, the above declaration. The bill would also authorize the court to make the additional findings only if requested by a party. The bill would provide that the asserted, purported, or perceived motivation of the child seeking classification as a special immigrant juvenile is not admissible in making findings and would prohibit the court from including or referencing the motivation of the child, as specified, in the court's findings. (3) Existing law establishes the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, under which each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families using federal, state, and county funds. Existing law requires a recipient of CalWORKs to participate in welfare-to-work activities as a condition of eligibility. Under existing law, a recipient of CalWORKs aid is required to assign to the county any rights to child support for a family member for whom the recipient is receiving aid, as specified. Existing law also requires the first $50 of any amount of child support collected in a month to be paid to a recipient of CalWORKs aid. Existing law also establishes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program, under which counties provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of qualified children in foster care. Under existing law, a child who is placed in the home of a relative is eligible for AFDC-FC only if he or she is eligible for federal financial participation in the AFDC-FC payment. Existing law establishes the Approved Relative Caregiver Funding Option Program, in counties that choose to participate, for the purpose of making the amount paid to relative caregivers for the in-home care of children placed with them who are ineligible for AFDC-FC payments equal to the amount paid on behalf of children who are eligible for AFDC-FC payments. Under existing law, a child who is eligible for the Approved Relative Caregiver Funding Option Program is not subject to the requirements of CalWORKs, except as specified. This bill would specify that the above-described CalWORKs requirements relating to the assignment of child support apply to assistance units participating in the Approved Relative Caregiver Funding Option Program. The bill would state that these provisions are intended to clarify existing law. (4) Existing law requires a county that has opted into the Approved Relative Caregiver Funding Option Program to pay an approved relative caregiver a per child per month rate that is equal to the basic rate paid to foster care providers and that is funded, in part, through the CalWORKs program. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would generally require a child who has been placed in the home of a relative who has been approved as a resource family to receive a grant that equals the resource family basic rate at the child's assessed level of care, as specified. By requiring counties to increase grants to children who are placed in the home of a relative who has been approved as a resource family, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law requires that, in order to be eligible for AFDC-FC, a child be placed in one of several specified placements, including the approved home of a resource family, and provides that a child placed with a resource family is eligible for AFDC-FC payments. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would instead provide that a child placed in the approved home of a resource family is eligible for AFDC-FC if the caregiver is a nonrelative or the caregiver is a relative and the child or youth is otherwise eligible for federal financial participation in the AFDC-FC payment. The bill would also specify that a child placed with a resource family is eligible for the resource family basic rate. (6) Existing law authorizes the Director of Social Services to enter into an agreement with a tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization, regarding the care and custody of Indian children and jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings, under specified circumstances. Existing law requires these agreements to provide for the delegation to the tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization, of the responsibility that would otherwise be the responsibility of the county for the provision of child welfare services or assistance payments under the AFDC-FC program, or both. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to annually allocate appropriated funds to each federally recognized American Indian tribe with reservation lands or rancherias in the state that administers a federal tribal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. This bill would establish the Tribal Approved Relative Caregiver Funding Option Program and would require participating tribes that opt to participate in the program to pay an approved relative caregiver a per child per month rate, as specified, in return for the care and supervision of an AFDC-FC ineligible child placed with the approved relative caregiver if the participating tribe has notified the department of its decision to participate in the program, as specified, and certain requirements are met, including that the child resides in California. The bill would require the department, in consultation with the participating tribe, to determine the initial base caseload of the tribe and to determine the amount necessary to fund the base caseload. (7) Existing law requires, when a child is living with a parent who receives AFDC-FC or Kin-GAP benefits, that the rate paid to the foster care provider on behalf of the parent include an additional amount, known as an infant supplement, for the care and supervision of the child. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to adopt a uniform rate for the infant supplement for each category of eligible licensed community care facility. This bill, commencing July 1, 2016, would require the infant supplement rate to be increased by $489 per month, if funding for this purpose is appropriated in the annual Budget Act. (8) Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to administer a voluntary Temporary Assistance Program (TAP) to provide cash assistance and other benefits to specified current and future CalWORKs recipients who meet the exemption criteria for participation in welfare-to-work activities and are not single parents who have a child under one year of age. Existing law requires the TAP to commence no later than October 1, 2016. This bill would make that provision inoperative on June 30, 2016. (9) Existing law requires, for counties that implement a welfare-to-work plan that includes subsidized private sector or public sector employment activities, the State Department of Social Services to pay the county 50%, less $113, of the total wage costs of an employee for whom a wage subsidy is paid, subject to specified conditions. This bill would make that provision inoperative on July 1, 2016, and would repeal that provision on January 1, 2017. The bill would make related changes. (10) Existing law requires the department to develop an allocation methodology to distribute additional funding for expanded subsidized employment programs for CalWORKs recipients. This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2016, a county that accepts additional funding for expanded subsidized employment in accordance with that provision to continue to expend no less than the aggregate amount of specified funding received by the county that the county expended on subsidized employment in the 2012–13 fiscal year, except as specified. (11) Existing law requires a recipient of CalWORKs to participate for a specified number of hours each week in welfare-to-work activities as a condition of eligibility. The federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014 provides for workforce investment activities, including activities in which states may participate. Existing federal law requires the local chief elected officials in a local workforce development area to form, pursuant to specified guidelines, a local workforce development board to, among other things, plan and oversee the workforce development system and lead efforts in the local area to develop and implement career pathways within the local area. This bill would deem a recipient who is making satisfactory progress in a career pathway program established in accordance with the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to be in compliance with the hourly participation requirements of the CalWORKS program under specified conditions. By increasing the duties of counties administering the CalWORKs program, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (12) As part of the CalWORKs program, existing law provides that a homeless family that has used all available liquid resources in excess of $100 may be eligible for homeless assistance benefits to pay the costs of temporary shelter. The CalWORKs program also provides permanent housing assistance to pay rent or a security deposit, as specified, in order to secure housing for the family or prevent eviction. Under existing law, eligibility for temporary shelter assistance is limited to one period of up to 16 consecutive days of temporary assistance in a lifetime, and eligibility for permanent housing assistance is limited to one payment of assistance, subject to specified exceptions. Existing law provides that a family that includes a parent or nonparent caretaker relative living in the home who has previously received temporary or permanent homeless assistance at any time on behalf of an eligible child is not eligible for further homeless assistance. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would expand the provision of temporary shelter assistance and permanent housing assistance to be available every 12 months. The bill would make conforming changes regarding an applicant for homeless assistance benefits being informed of the availability of the benefits every 12 months. The bill would delete the above limitation on a family's eligibility for homeless assistance. Because this bill would increase the administrative duties of counties, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (13) Existing law, referred to as the maximum family grant rule, prohibits the number of needy persons in the same family from being increased, for purposes of determining a family's maximum aid payment, for any child born into a family that has received aid under the CalWORKs program continuously for the 10 months prior to the birth of the child, with specified exceptions. This bill would repeal the maximum family grant rule on January 1, 2017. (14) Existing law establishes maximum aid grant amounts to be provided to each family receiving aid under CalWORKs. Existing law increases the maximum aid payments by 5% commencing March 1, 2014, and by an additional 5% commencing April 1, 2015. Existing law specifies a process by which increases may be made to the maximum aid payments depending on projections of revenue and costs by the Department of Finance. This bill would, effective October 1, 2016, increase the maximum aid grant amounts by an additional 1.43%. The bill would also, effective January 1, 2017, require households eligible for CalWORKs aid to receive an increased aid payment consistent with the repeal of the maximum family grant rule and would require those costs to be paid from moneys deposited into the Child Poverty and Family Supplemental Support Subaccount. To the extent that this bill affects eligibility under the CalWORKs program, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (15) Existing law establishes the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law provides, as part of the Coordinated Care Initiative, that IHSS is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health plans in specified counties. Existing law provides for a 7% reduction in authorized hours of service to each IHSS recipient, as specified. Existing law, commencing July 1, 2016, until July 1, 2019, establishes a managed care organization provider tax, to be administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, as specified, subject to approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as specified. This bill would suspend the 7% reduction in hours of service to each IHSS recipient until July 1, 2019, if the managed care organization provider tax remains operative. The bill would require the reduction to be reinstated by a specified date if the managed care organization provider tax ceases to be operative for any reason. By increasing the administrative duties of counties under the IHSS program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (16) Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to implement a single statewide Child Welfare Services Case Management System (CWS/CMS) to administer and evaluate the state's child welfare services and foster care programs. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services and the Office of Systems Integration (OSI) , in collaboration with the County Welfare Directors Association (CWDA) , to seek resources to enable the necessary level of engagement by the counties in the Child Welfare Services-New System (CWS-NS) , as specified. The bill would require the department and OSI to provide a voting seat on all governance bodies of the CWS-NS for a CWDA representative. The bill would also require the department and OSI to continue to provide monthly updates to the Legislature and to stakeholders, including CWDA, regarding efforts to develop and implement the CWS-NS. The bill would also require CWS/CMS operations and functionality to be maintained at a level at least commensurate with its December 2015 status, as specified. The bill would make related findings and declarations. (17) Existing law establishes a system of statewide child welfare services, administered by the State Department of Social Services and county child welfare agencies, with the intent that all children are entitled to be safe and free from abuse and neglect. This bill would establish the Bringing Families Home Program, and would, to the extent funds are appropriated in the annual Budget Act, require the State Department of Social Services to award program funds to counties for the purpose of providing housing-related supports to eligible families experiencing homelessness if specified criteria are met. The bill would require the department to award program funds to counties according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with specified entities, subject to a requirement that a county that receives funds under the program provide matching funds for these purposes, as specified. (18) Existing federal law provides for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) , known in California as CalFresh, under which supplemental nutrition assistance benefits allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to redetermine recipient eligibility and grant amounts under CalFresh on a semiannual basis, as specified. Existing law states the intent of the Legislature to assign certification periods for CalFresh households that are the maximum number of months allowed under federal law based on the household's circumstances, subject to a specified exception. This bill would instead require the assignment of certification periods in the above-described manner, as specified, and would provide an additional exception, on a case-by-case basis only, for a household's individual circumstances requiring a shorter certification period. Because this bill would increase the administrative duties of counties, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (19) Existing law, the State Department of Health Services Cooperative Agreement Act, provides for the establishment of cooperative agreements between the State Department of Public Health and other public and private entities for the purposes of, among other things, simplifying the administration of public health programs by the department. The act requires cooperative agreements to be subject to review and approval by the Department of General Services with certain exceptions. This bill would deem an agreement between the State Department of Social Services and a unit of local government, any other unit of state government, or a nonprofit organization that provides for a contract relating to outreach programs related to CalFresh and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Grant Program to be a "cooperative agreement," as defined. The bill would specify that these changes apply retroactively. (20) Existing federal law establishes various disability benefits programs, including the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, under which cash assistance is provided to qualified low-income aged, blind, and disabled persons, and the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program, under which benefits are provided to persons with disabilities who have paid social security taxes. Existing federal law also provides for disability compensation for veterans under specified circumstances. Existing state law provides for disability benefits programs, including the State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled (SSP) , under which state funds are provided in supplementation of federal SSI benefits, and the Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants, which provides benefits to aged, blind, and disabled legal immigrants who meet specified criteria. Existing law also establishes various housing programs directed by the Department of Housing and Community Development, including special housing programs to provide housing assistance for persons with developmental and physical disabilities and persons with mental health disorders. This bill would establish the Housing and Disability Income Advocacy Program under the administration of the State Department of Social Services, subject to an appropriation of funds in the annual Budget Act. The program would provide state grant funds to participating counties for the provision of outreach, case management, and advocacy services to assist clients who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless to obtain disability benefits. The bill would require participating counties to provide housing assistance to these clients during their application periods for disability benefits programs, as specified. The bill would also require participating counties to annually report to the department regarding their funding of advocacy and outreach programs and use of state funding provided under the program, as specified. The bill would require the department to periodically inform the Legislature of the implementation progress of the program, to make related data available on the department's Internet Web site, and to report to the Legislature by October 1, 2018, regarding the implementation of the program, as specified. (21) Under existing law, benefit payments under SSP are calculated by establishing the maximum level of nonexempt income and federal SSI and state SSP benefits for each category of eligible recipient. The state SSP payment is the amount required, when added to the nonexempt income and SSI benefits available to the recipient, to provide the maximum benefit payment. Existing law prohibits, for each calendar year, commencing with the 2011 calendar year, any cost-of-living adjustment from being made to the maximum benefit payment unless otherwise specified by statute, except for the pass along of any cost-of-living increase in the federal SSI benefits. Existing law continuously appropriates funds for the implementation of SSP. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would increase the amount of aid paid under SSP that is in effect on December 31, 2016, less the federal benefit portion received, by 2.76%. The bill would instead provide that the continuous appropriation would not be made for purposes of implementing these provisions. (22) Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services and the State Department of Health Care Services to carry out specified duties relating the administration of foster care services. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services and the State Department of Health Care Services, during the 2017 and 2018 legislative budget hearings, to update the legislative budget committees on activities taken by the departments to implement specified reform measures relating to foster care. The bill would also require the State Department of Social Services to convene stakeholders, including county placing agencies, providers, foster youth, and legislative staff, commencing no later than July 1, 2016, to discuss the adequacy of the proposed foster care rates and rate structure and the extent to which the rates will achieve the desired outcomes for those reform measures, to report to legislative budget committees, and to provide updated project costs, as specified. (23) The bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to adopt emergency regulations implementing specified provisions of the bill. (24) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (25) Existing federal law provides for the allocation of federal funds through the federal TANF block grant program to eligible states. The state CalWORKs program is funded through a combination of federal funds received through the federal TANF block grant program and state and county funds. Existing law continuously appropriates moneys from the General Fund to defray a portion of county costs under the CalWORKs program. By expanding eligibility for, increasing assistance payments to recipients of, and adjusting funding formulas for counties providing benefits under, the CalWORKs program, and by providing funding for the Tribal Approved Relative Caregiver Funding Option Program, which is also funded by TANF, the bill would make an appropriation. (26) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Jun 2016
Introduced Jan 7, 2016
Signed Jun 27, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 16, 2016 · Assembly Apr 28, 2016
How they voted
27–6
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Jun 16, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
54% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Jun 27, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 16, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-6-2)
senate
Jun 16, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 5394.).
lower
Jun 16, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 18 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (June 15).
upper
Jun 13, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken.
upper
Jun 13, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
May 5, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-24-3)
assembly
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Feb 1, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jan 8, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 7.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1603
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1603. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline