Investigational drugs, biological products, and devices.
Summary
Existing law, the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, prohibits a person from introducing into interstate commerce any new drug unless the drug has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) . Existing law requires the sponsor of a new drug to submit to the FDA an investigational new drug application and to then conduct a series of clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug in human populations and submit the results to the FDA in a new drug application. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices and is administered by the State Department of Public Health. A violation of that law is a crime. The Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law prohibits, among other things, the sale, delivery, or giving away of a new drug or new device unless either the department has approved a new drug or device application for that new drug or new device and that approval has not been withdrawn, terminated, or suspended or the drug or device has been approved pursuant to specified provisions of federal law, including the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The Medical Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California and requires the board to take action against a licensee who is charged with unprofessional conduct. The Osteopathic Act provides for the licensure and regulation of osteopathic physicians and surgeons by the Osteopathic Medical Board of California and requires the board to enforce the Medical Practice Act with respect to its licensees. This bill would permit a manufacturer of an investigational drug, biological product, or device to make the product available to eligible patients with an immediately life-threatening disease or condition, as specified. The bill would authorize, but not require, a health benefit plan, as defined, to provide coverage for any investigational drug, biological product, or device made available pursuant to these provisions. The bill would prohibit the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California from taking any disciplinary action against the license of a physician based solely on the physician's recommendation to an eligible patient regarding, or prescription for or treatment with, an investigational drug, biological product, or device if the recommendation or prescription is consistent with protocol approved by the physician's institutional review board or an accredited institutional review board, and would require the institutional review board to biannually report specified information to the State Department of Public Health, among others. The bill would prohibit a state agency from altering any recommendation made to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regarding a health care provider's certification to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid program based solely on the recommendation from an individual health care provider that a patient have access to an investigational drug, biological product, or device.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Vetoed
Oct 2015
Introduced Jan 21, 2015
Vetoed Oct 11, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 1, 2015 · Assembly May 18, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Sep 1, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
8
Committee
14
Amendments
6
Jan 15, 2016
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 11, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 2, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 2. Page 2799.).
lower
Sep 1, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Sep 1, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 27).
upper
Jul 13, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 6, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 30, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 16, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 15, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
May 28, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 18, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-2-4)
assembly
May 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 14, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Apr 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 7).
lower
Feb 2, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. & P.
lower
Jan 22, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 21.
lower
0 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 159
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 159. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline