Tribal gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments to tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians, executed on August 26, 2015. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions are not projects for the purposes of CEQA. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Mar 26, 2015
Signed Oct 6, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2015 · Assembly Sep 3, 2015
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 2, 2015
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Oct 6, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 3, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Sep 3, 2015
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2863.).
lower
Sep 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Sep 2, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
May 28, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 7, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee April 26.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1540
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1540. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline