Gambling: Internet Fantasy Sports Game Protection Act.
Summary
Existing law, the Gambling Control Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of various legalized gambling activities and establishments by the California Gambling Control Commission and the investigation and enforcement of those activities and establishments by the Department of Justice. Existing law prohibits a person, whether or not for gain, hire, or reward, from making a betting pool or placing a bet or wager on the result of any contest or event, including a sporting event, as specified. This bill would enact the Internet Fantasy Sports Games Consumer Protection Act, which would require a person or entity to apply for, and receive, a license from the department prior to offering an Internet fantasy sports game for play in California. The bill would require the department to issue a license to a person or entity that applies for a license if the person or entity satisfies specified requirements, including, among others, that the applicant is of good character, honesty, and integrity. The bill would also require a person to register with a "licensed operator" prior to participating in an "Internet fantasy sports game" on an "authorized Internet Web site," as those terms are defined. The bill would prohibit a licensed operator from offering an Internet fantasy sports game based on a collegiate sports or athletic event, or any other sports or athletic event in which amateur athletes participate. The bill would require a licensed operator, among other things, to ensure that a registered player is eligible to play on an authorized Internet Web site, and to implement appropriate data security standards to prevent access by a person whose age and location have not been verified. The bill would authorize the department to assess a civil penalty against a licensed operator that violates these provisions according to a specified schedule depending on the number of violations. The bill would require the department to develop an online self-exclusion form on or before July 1, 2017, and to deliver that form to each licensed operator, and would require each licensed operator to make that form available to its registered players. The bill would also require a licensed operator to, among other things, hold the funds in a registered player's account in trust for that registered player. The bill would prohibit a licensed operator from engaging in certain activities, including, among other things, from allowing a registered player to establish more than one account or user name on its authorized Internet Web site, from issuing credit to a registered player, from advertising in publications or other media that are aimed exclusively or primarily at persons under 21 years of age, and from depicting persons under 21 years of age, students, or school or college settings in its advertisements. The bill would also prohibit an officer, director, principal, employee, or contractor of a licensed operator from engaging in certain activities, including, among other things, from playing an Internet fantasy sports game offered by a licensed operator. The bill would require a licensed operator to pay an annual regulatory fee, for deposit into the Fantasy Sports Fund, which the bill would establish in the State Treasury. The bill would continuously appropriate the Fantasy Sports Fund to the department for the reasonable costs of license oversight, consumer protection, state regulation, and other purposes related to the bill. The bill would require each licensed operator to pay a one-time license fee into the General Fund in an unspecified amount. The license fee would be credited against quarterly fees equivalent to an unspecified percentage of the licensed operator's gross income that is attributable to the operation of an authorized Internet Web site in California. The bill would make proprietary information provided by a licensed operator confidential in order to protect the licensed operator and to protect the security of an authorized Internet Web site. The bill would also prohibit a city, county, or city and county from regulating, taxing, or entering into a contract with respect to, any matter governed to the bill's provisions, and would make conforming changes. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Jan 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Last action Jun 28, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2016
How they voted
67–1
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 77
Jan 27, 2016
D
Democratic51
92% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican25
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Jun 28, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 12, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and RLS.
upper
Jan 27, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-1-9)
assembly
Jan 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 21).
lower
Jan 21, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jan 13, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 1.) (January 6).
lower
Sep 11, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1437
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1437. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline