Food facilities.
Summary
Existing law, the California Retail Food Code, establishes uniform health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities, as defined. Existing law exempts from the definition of food facility premises set aside for wine tasting, regardless of whether there is a charge for the wine tasting, if no other beverage, except for bottles of wine and prepackaged nonpotentially hazardous beverages, is offered for sale for onsite consumption and no food, except for crackers, is served. Existing law prohibits certain premises from having a food display area that exceeds 25 square feet, and subjects certain facilities or premises with a food display area of 25 square feet or less to specified provisions of the code. Existing law imposes certain enforcement duties on the State Department of Public Health, but provides that local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing these provisions. A person who violates any provision of the code is guilty of a misdemeanor, except as otherwise provided. This bill would additionally exclude from the definition of food facility a premises set aside for wine tasting that offers pretzels or prepackaged nonpotentially hazardous food for sale or for onsite consumption. The bill would limit the food display area in premises set aside for wine tasting to 25 square feet and subject those premises to specified provisions of the California Retail Food Code. By imposing new duties on local health agencies, and by expanding the definition of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, for the purposes of the California Retail Food Code, defines "community event" to mean an event that is of a civic, political, public, or educational nature. This bill would limit the definition of a community event to include only an event of a civic, political, public, or educational nature conducted for not more than 25 consecutive or nonconsecutive days in a 90-day period. Under existing law, a permanent food facility is required to provide clean toilet facilities in good repair for consumers, guests, and invitees, except that a building constructed before January 1, 2004, that has a food facility that provides space for the consumption of food on the premises may either provide clean toilet facilities in good repair or prominently post a sign in a public area stating that toilet facilities are not provided. This bill would limit the above exemption to food facilities that have been in continuous operation since January 1, 2004. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2015
Committee Review
Jul 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Jul 2015
Signed into Law
Aug 2015
Introduced Jan 12, 2015
Signed Aug 11, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jul 2, 2015 · Assembly Jul 6, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Jul 2, 2015
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Aug 11, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 6, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Jul 6, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2253.).
lower
Jul 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Jul 2, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
May 21, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Apr 29, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 20, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 16, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JW
Jim Wood
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 143
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 143. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline