Prisoners: medical treatment.
Summary
Existing law provides for the designation and selection of health care surrogates, and for the manner of making health care decisions for patients without surrogates. Existing law prohibits the administration of psychiatric medication to an inmate in state prison on a nonemergency basis without the inmate's informed consent, unless certain conditions are satisfied, including, among other things, that a psychiatrist determines that the inmate is gravely disabled and does not have the capacity to refuse treatment with psychiatric medication. Existing law authorizes a physician to administer psychiatric medication to a prison inmate in specified emergency situations. This bill would, except as provided, establish a process for a licensed physician or dentist to file a petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings to request that an administrative law judge make a determination as to a patient's capacity to give informed consent or make a health care decision, and request appointment of a surrogate decisionmaker, if the patient is an adult housed in state prison, the physician or dentist is unable to obtain informed consent from the inmate patient because the physician or dentist determines that the inmate patient appears to lack capacity to provide informed consent or make a health care decision, and there is no person with legal authority to provide informed consent for, or make decisions concerning the health care of, the inmate patient. The bill would require the petition to contain specified information, including, among other things, the inmate patient's current physical condition and a description of the health care conditions currently afflicting the inmate patient. This bill would require that the petition be served on the inmate patient and his or her counsel, and filed with the office, as provided. The bill would also require that the inmate patient be provided with counsel and a written notice advising him or her of, among other things, the inmate patient's right to be present at the hearing. Except as specified, the bill would require that the inmate patient be provided with a hearing before an administrative law judge within 30 days of the date of filing the petition. In case of an emergency, as defined, the bill would authorize the inmate patient's physician or dentist to administer a medical intervention that requires informed consent prior to the date of the administrative hearing and would require that counsel for the inmate patient be notified by the physician or dentist. The bill would require the administrative law judge to determine and provide a written order and findings setting forth whether there has been clear and convincing evidence that, among other things, the inmate patient lacks capacity to give informed consent or make a health care decision. If the findings required by these provisions are made, the bill would require the administrative law judge to appoint a surrogate decisionmaker for health care for the inmate patient, as provided, which would be valid for one year and would be valid at any state correctional facility within California. The bill would also provide for a process to renew the appointment of the surrogate decisionmaker. The bill would authorize the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to adopt regulations as necessary to carry out these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Sep 30, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2015 · Assembly May 22, 2015
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 2, 2015
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
12
Sep 30, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Sep 2, 2015
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 7, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 4, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 22, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-5)
assembly
May 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and HEALTH.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1423
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1423. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline