Property tax: base year value transfers.
Summary
The California Constitution and existing property tax law authorize taxpayers to transfer the base year value, as defined, of property to replacement property, if certain conditions are met, including, among others, that the claimant has not previously been granted, as a claimant, this property tax relief. For purposes of this property tax relief, existing law defines a "claimant" as any person claiming the property tax relief provided by this section, and provides that if a spouse of the claimant is a record owner of the replacement dwelling, the spouse is also considered a claimant for purposes of determining whether, in any future claim filed by the spouse this condition of eligibility has been met. This bill would eliminate the requirement that, if a spouse of the claimant is a record owner of the replacement dwelling, the spouse also be considered a claimant for purposes of determining whether, in any future claim filed by the spouse, the condition of eligibility has been met, and would also make conforming changes to that provision. This bill would provide that this property tax relief applies only to persons who file a claim on or after January 1, 2016, and who have not been previously granted this property tax relief, as specified. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Vetoed
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Vetoed Oct 2, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 1, 2015 · Assembly Jun 1, 2015
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 1, 2015
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Jan 15, 2016
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 2, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 1, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (40-0)
senate
Sep 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (78-0)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 27, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 19, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 23, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1378
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1378. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline