School facilities: design-build contracts.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district, until January 1, 2020, and upon a determination by the governing board of the school district that it is in the best interest of the school district, to enter into a design-build contract for both the design and construction of a school facility if that expenditure exceeds $2,500,000, as provided. This bill would make those provisions inoperative on July 1, 2016, and as of that date would instead authorize, until January 1, 2025, a school district, with the approval of the governing board of the school district, to procure design-build contracts for public works projects in excess of $1,000,000, awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value, as provided. The bill would require specified information to be verified under penalty of perjury. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Aug 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Oct 10, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2015 · Assembly May 14, 2015
How they voted
25–10
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 31, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Oct 10, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 21. Page 2775.).
lower
Aug 31, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-10)
senate
Aug 31, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 17).
upper
Jul 9, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 1).
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 14, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-15-1)
assembly
May 6, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 23, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 23, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Matthew Dababneh
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1358
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1358. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline