Criminal procedure: defense counsel.
Summary
Existing law requires the court in a noncapital case, if the defendant appears for arraignment without counsel, to inform the defendant that it is his or her right to have counsel before being arraigned and to ask the defendant if he or she desires the assistance of counsel. If the defendant desires and is unable to employ counsel, the court is required to assign counsel to defend him or her as provided. Existing law requires courts, prior to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere by a defendant, to inform the defendant that a conviction of the offense charged may have the consequences of deportation, exclusion from admission to the United States, or denial of naturalization pursuant to the laws of the United States. This bill would require defense counsel to provide accurate and affirmative advice about the immigration consequences of a proposed disposition, and when consistent with the goals of and with the informed consent of the defendant, and with professional standards, defend against those consequences. The bill would require the prosecution, in the interests of justice, to consider the avoidance of adverse immigration consequences in the plea negotiation process as one factor in an effort to reach a just resolution. By requiring an increased level of service, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Oct 9, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2015 · Assembly May 18, 2015
How they voted
31–4
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 2, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
15
Amendments
1
Oct 9, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2914.).
lower
Sep 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-4)
senate
Sep 2, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 7, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 23, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 22, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 16, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 8, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 28, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 18, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-3)
assembly
Apr 29, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tony Thurmond
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1343
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1343. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline