Criminal procedure: withholding of evidence.
Summary
Existing law requires the prosecuting attorney to disclose to the defendant or his or her attorney certain materials and information, including statements of all defendants and any exculpatory evidence, as specified. Existing law authorizes a court to grant a motion to disqualify a district attorney from performing an authorized duty, subject to specified procedural requirements. This bill would authorize a court, upon receiving information that the prosecuting attorney has deliberately and intentionally withheld relevant or material exculpatory evidence or information in violation of law, to make a finding, supported by clear and convincing evidence, that a violation occurred. If the court makes such a finding, the bill would require the court to inform the State Bar of California of that violation if the prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith and the impact of the withholding contributed to a guilty verdict, guilty or nolo contendere plea, or, if identified before conclusion of trial, seriously limited the ability of a defendant to present a defense. The bill would authorize a court to disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney from a case if the court finds that a violation occurred in bad faith. The bill would also authorize, upon a determination by a court to disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney from a case, the defendant or his or her counsel to file and serve a notice of a motion to disqualify the prosecuting attorney's office if there is sufficient evidence that other employees of the prosecuting attorney's office knowingly and in bad faith participated in or sanctioned the intentional withholding of the relevant or material exculpatory evidence or information and that withholding is part of a pattern and practice of violations. The bill would specify that its provisions do not limit the authority or discretion of, or any requirement placed upon, the court or other individuals to make reports to the State Bar of California regarding the same conduct, or otherwise limit other available legal authority, requirements, remedies, or actions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Oct 3, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2015 · Assembly Jun 1, 2015
How they voted
24–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 11, 2015
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Oct 3, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-10-1)
senate
Sep 11, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 26. Page 3157.).
lower
Sep 10, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 15, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-34-2)
assembly
Apr 15, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 23, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Shirley N. Weber
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1328
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1328. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline