Mental health services: assisted outpatient treatment.
Summary
Existing law, the Assisted Outpatient Treatment Demonstration Project Act of 2002, known as Laura's Law, until January 1, 2017, authorizes each county to elect, through a resolution adopted by the county board of supervisors or through the county budget process and along with a finding that specified mental health programs may not be reduced as a result of participation, to offer certain assisted outpatient treatment services for their residents. Existing law authorizes participating counties to pay for the services provided from moneys distributed to the counties from various continuously appropriated funds, including the Mental Health Services Fund when included in a county plan, as specified. This bill would delete the requirement that the board of supervisors of a county that elects to participate in the program make the finding described above. The bill instead would require a county that has not held a specified public hearing by January 1, 2017, to hold a hearing by January 1, 2018, and would require the board of supervisors to consider both whether specified programs may be reduced as a result of participation and options for providing services other than court-ordered outpatient treatment, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would extend the January 1, 2017, repeal date of those provisions until January 1, 2022. Existing law authorizes various persons to request the county mental health director to file a petition in the superior court for an order for assisted outpatient treatment for a person who meets specified criteria. Existing law requires the county mental health director to investigate the appropriateness of filing a petition. This bill would additionally authorize a judge in a superior court's mental health court, reentry court, or other collaborative justice court available for improving the mental health of the defendant, or a probate court, as specified, to request a petition for that order to be filed for a person who appears before the judge. The bill would make additional conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Amendments
2
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 13, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 4, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 23, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Susan Eggman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1193
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1193. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline