School accountability: teacher evaluations.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish standards of expected pupil achievement at each grade level in each area of study and to evaluate and assess certificated employee performance on a continuing basis as it reasonably relates to the progress of pupils toward the established standards and, if applicable, the state adopted academic content standards as measured by state adopted criterion referenced assessments, the instructional techniques and strategies used by the employee, the employee's adherence to curricular objectives, and the establishment and maintenance of a suitable learning environment, within the scope of the employee's responsibilities. This bill would require the superintendent of a school district and a county superintendent of schools to make available to the public, and post on its Internet Web site, if it has one, specified information relating to the evaluation of teachers and principals. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2015
How they voted
62–2
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 72
May 28, 2015
D
Democratic47
82% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 7, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 1).
upper
Jun 24, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 28, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-2-8)
assembly
May 20, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).
lower
May 7, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 5, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 9, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 16 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Co
Beth Gaines
RRepublican
Co
Chad Mayes
IIndependent
Co
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Co
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Co
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Co
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Co
Katcho Achadjian
RRepublican
Co
Ling Ling Chang
RRepublican
Co
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Co
Matthew Harper
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1099
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1099. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline