Personal representatives: conservators and attorneys-in-fact.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a conservator of a person to be responsible for the care, custody, control, and education of a conservatee, except where the court, in its discretion, limits the powers and duties of the conservator. Existing law also provides that the conservator's control of the conservatee shall not extend to personal rights retained by the conservatee, including, but not limited to, the right to receive visitors, telephone calls, and personal mail, unless specifically limited by a court order. This bill would provide that a court order may be issued that specifically grants the conservator the power to limit or enforce the conservatee's right to receive visitors, telephone calls, and personal mail. The bill would state findings and declarations of the Legislature in this regard. (2) Existing law additionally authorizes an adult with capacity to execute a power of attorney for health care. This bill would require a conservator to provide notice of a conservatee's death by mailing a copy of the notice to specified persons, as provided. The bill would require an attorney-in-fact, if directed by the principal in a power of attorney for health care, upon the death of the principal, to inform those individuals whose names are provided by the principal for that purpose.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Signed into Law
Jul 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Jul 14, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 25, 2015 · Assembly May 18, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jun 25, 2015
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Jul 14, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 25, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jun 25, 2015
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 16).
upper
May 28, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 18, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-3)
assembly
May 12, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 12).
lower
May 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 22, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 14, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1085
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1085. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline