Bail forfeiture: motion to extend time.
Summary
Existing law permits the surety insurer, the bail agent, the surety, or the depositor to file a motion, based upon good cause, for an order to extend the 180-day period following forfeiture of the undertaking of bail or the money or property deposited as bail, as specified. Existing law permits the court, upon a hearing and showing of good cause, to order the period extended to a time not exceeding 180 days from its order. Existing law requires the moving party to give the prosecuting agency a written notice of at least 10 court days before the hearing as a condition precedent to granting the motion. This bill would change the period of time to require the moving party to give the prosecuting agency a written notice of at least 12 court days before the hearing as a condition precedent to granting the motion.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Apr 21, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1082
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1082. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline