Agricultural workers: wages, hours, and working conditions.
Summary
Existing law sets wage, hour, meal break requirements, and other working conditions for employees and requires an employer to pay overtime wages as specified to an employee who works in excess of a workday or workweek, as defined, and imposes criminal penalties for the violation of these requirements. Existing law exempts agricultural employees from these requirements. Under existing law, the function of the Department of Industrial Relations is to, among other things, foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners of California, to improve their working conditions, and to advance their opportunities for profitable employment. This bill would remove the exemption for agricultural employees regarding hours, meal breaks, and other working conditions, including specified wage requirements, and would create a schedule that would phase in overtime requirements for agricultural workers, as defined, over the course of 4 years, from 2019 to 2022, inclusive. Beginning January 1, 2022, the bill would require any work performed by a person, employed in an agricultural occupation, in excess of 12 hours in one day to be compensated at the rate of no less than twice the employee's regular rate of pay. The bill would provide employers who employ 25 or fewer employees an additional 3 years to comply with the phasing in of these overtime requirements. The bill would authorize the Governor to delay the implementation of these overtime pay provisions if the Governor also suspends the implementation of a scheduled state minimum wage increase, as specified. The bill would require the Department of Industrial Relations to update a specified wage order for consistency with these provisions, as specified. The bill would create a state-mandated local program by including agricultural employees as a class of employees protected by criminal penalties under existing law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Signed Sep 12, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
48–23
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 72
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic47
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican24
87% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
6
Committee
17
Amendments
1
Sep 12, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 44. Noes 32. Page 6333.).
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 14, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-23-1)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 18, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
lower
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E., R., & S.S. and HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 16 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lorena Gonzalez
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Co
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
Jose Medina
DDemocratic
Co
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Co
Kevin McCarty
DDemocratic
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Co
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1066
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1066. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline