Public Utilities Commission: proceedings: ex parte communications.
Summary
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission, with jurisdiction over all public utilities and authorizes the commission to establish rules for all public utilities, subject to control by the Legislature, and to establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to determine whether a proceeding requires a hearing and, if so, to determine whether the matter requires a quasi-legislative, an adjudication, or a ratesetting hearing. For these purposes, quasi-legislative cases are cases that establish policy rulemakings and investigations which may establish rules affecting an entire industry, adjudication cases are enforcement cases and complaints except those challenging the reasonableness of any rates or charges, and ratesetting cases are cases in which rates are established for a specific company, including general rate cases, performance-based ratemaking, and other ratesetting mechanisms. Existing law requires the commission, upon initiating a hearing, to assign one or more commissioners to oversee the case and an administrative law judge, where appropriate. The act regulates communications in hearings before the commission and defines "ex parte communication" to mean any oral or written communication between a decisionmaker and a person with an interest in a matter before the commission concerning substantive, but not procedural, issues that does not occur in a public hearing, workshop, or other public proceeding, or on the official record of the proceeding on the matter. Existing law requires the commission, by regulation, to adopt and publish a definition of the terms "decisionmaker" and "persons" for those purposes, along with any requirements for written reporting of ex parte communications and appropriate sanctions for noncompliance with any rule proscribing ex parte communications. This bill would require the commission to establish and maintain a weekly communications log summarizing all oral and written ex parte communications, as specified, and to make each log available to the public on the commission's Internet Web site.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Vetoed
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Vetoed Oct 9, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2015 · Assembly Sep 11, 2015
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 11, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Jan 19, 2016
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 9, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Sep 11, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Sep 11, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3148.).
lower
Sep 10, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 18, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 13).
upper
Jun 29, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 4, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 28, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anthony Rendon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1023
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1023. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline