Automated license plate recognition systems: use of data.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of the California Highway Patrol to retain license plate data captured by license plate recognition (LPR) technology, also referred to as an automated license plate recognition (ALPR) system, for not more than 60 days unless the data is being used as evidence or for the investigation of felonies. Existing law prohibits the department from selling the data or from making the data available to an agency that is not a law enforcement agency or an individual that is not a law enforcement officer. Existing law authorizes the department to use LPR data for the purpose of locating vehicles or persons reasonably suspected of being involved in the commission of a public offense, and requires the department to monitor the internal use of the data to prevent unauthorized use and to submit to the Legislature, as a part of the annual automobile theft report, information on the department's LPR practices and usage. This bill would impose specified requirements on an "ALPR operator," as defined, including, among others, complying with all applicable statutory and constitutional requirements and the provisions of the bill, ensuring that the information or data the ALPR operator collects is protected with certain safeguards, and implementing and maintaining specified security procedures and a usage and privacy policy with respect to that information or data. This bill would also prohibit an ALPR operator from collecting license plate data when a license plate number is not in public view. The bill would require an ALPR operator that accesses or provides access to information or data collected through the use or operation of an ALPR system to maintain a specified record of that access. The bill would, in addition to any other sanctions, penalties, or remedies provided by law, authorize an individual who has been harmed by a violation of these provisions to bring a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction against a person who knowingly caused that violation. (2) Existing law requires any agency, and any person or business conducting business in California, that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information, as defined, to disclose in specified ways, any breach of the security of the system or data, as defined, following discovery or notification of the security breach, to any California resident whose unencrypted personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. Existing law defines "personal information" for these purposes to include an individual's first name and last name, or first initial and last name, in combination with one or more designated data elements relating to, among other things, social security numbers, driver's license numbers, financial accounts, and medical information. This bill would include information or data collected through the use or operation of an automated license plate recognition system, when that information or data is not encrypted and is used in combination with an individual's name, in the definition of "personal information" discussed above.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2014
Committee Review
May 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2014
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 29, 2014
D
Democratic28
85% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
1
May 29, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-4)
senate
May 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3704.) (May 23).
upper
May 6, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 29, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 28, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3235.) (April 22).
upper
Apr 9, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 23, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 893
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 893. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline