State employees: memoranda of understanding.
Summary
Existing law provides that a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions of memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 2, the California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges, and Hearing Officers in State Employment, on August 14, 2014, State Bargaining Unit 10, the California Association of Professional Scientists, on August 12, 2014, and State Bargaining Unit 13, the International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, on August 21, 2014, that require the expenditure of funds, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. The bill would prohibit provisions of the memorandum of understanding approved by this bill that authorize the expenditure of funds from taking effect unless funds for those provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organization to reopen negotiations on all or part of the memorandum of understanding if those provisions are not approved or fully funded by the Legislature. The bill would appropriate funds for expenditure in the 2014–15 fiscal year in augmentation of, and for the purpose of, state employee compensation, as provided in the Budget Act of 2014, in accordance with a specified schedule, from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, and other unallocated nongovernmental cost funds. The bill would also appropriate to the Controller from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, including, but not limited to, federal funds and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, and any other fund from which state employees are compensated, in the amount necessary for the payment of compensation and employee benefits to state employees for work performed between July 1 and the enactment of the Budget Act in the 2015–16 and 2016–17 fiscal years if the Budget Act is not enacted on or before July 1 in those fiscal years. Existing law requires the Department of Human Resources to provide to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee any side letter, appendix, or other addendum to a properly ratified memorandum of understanding that requires the expenditure of $250,000 or more related to salary and benefits and that is not already contained in the original memorandum of understanding or the Budget Act. Existing law requires the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, within 30 days after receiving the side letter, appendix, or other addendum, to determine if the addendum presents substantial additions that are not reasonably within the parameters of the original memorandum of understanding and thereby requires legislative action to ratify the addendum. This bill would approve the addenda to memoranda of understanding entered into by the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 8, the California Department of Forestry Firefighters on August 26, 2014. The bill would also appropriate $10,236,000 from the General Fund and other unallocated special and nongovernmental cost funds for those purposes. The bill would prohibit provisions of the addenda to the memorandum of understanding approved by this bill that authorize the expenditure of funds from taking effect unless funds for those provisions already exist within other available appropriations or are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would require the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for these purposes are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
Apr 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Jan 9, 2014
Signed Sep 27, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Apr 10, 2014 · Assembly Aug 29, 2014
How they voted
20–10
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Apr 10, 2014
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 27, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-9-7)
assembly
Aug 29, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4999.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 29, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 28, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 19. Noes 9.) (August 28).
lower
Aug 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Aug 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Aug 25, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 10.) (August 14).
lower
May 8, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Apr 10, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-10-5)
senate
Jan 23, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 879
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 879. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline