State Highway Route 710.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law imposes various requirements for the development and implementation of transportation projects. This bill would impose various additional requirements on the department, or on another agency, if that agency agrees to assume responsibility as the lead agency, with respect to the I-710 corridor project in the County of Los Angeles from State Highway Route 60 in East Los Angeles to Ocean Boulevard in Long Beach. The bill would require the lead agency, in consultation with all interested community organizations, to include, within the environmental review process for the project, alternatives to address the air quality, public health, and mobility impacts the project will have on neighboring communities, including, in its entirety, Community Alternative 7, as defined, as a complete project alternative. The bill would require the final environmental document approved by the lead agency to include an investment in identified mitigation measures and community benefits for the affected communities and the Los Angeles River. The bill would require the lead agency to submit a report in that regard to the I-710 EIR/EIS Project Committee at least 90 days prior to approving the final environmental document for the project. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Vetoed Oct 11, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Sep 9, 2013
How they voted
27–8
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
13
Committee
13
Amendments
3
Feb 27, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 11, 2013
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 11, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 10. Page 2295.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-18-2)
assembly
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 15).
lower
Aug 13, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 12). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Aug 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jun 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and NAT. RES.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-8-1)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1020.) (May 23).
upper
May 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 760.) (April 30).
upper
Apr 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on T. & H. and APPR.
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 811
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 811. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline