Inmates: civil rights.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to institute certain practices to prevent sexual violence and promote inmate and ward safety in the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. This bill would require the department and all local corrections agencies; city, county, city and county, and regional juvenile justice facilities; police lockups; and all private confinement companies, as defined, to create a safe environment free from sexual abuse for inmates or arrestees, including those inmates or arrestees subject to a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement hold, by adopting policies and procedures implementing specified federal regulations. The bill would require the entities to audit, on a 3-year cycle, all facilities operated by the agency, department, or company, as specified. The bill would require the Board of State and Community Corrections to provide means for members of the public to raise concrete and specific concerns about material insufficiency of the published policies or procedures and would require the board to certify auditors, create a standard audit report format, and recommend or require the agency, department, or company to audit specified facilities when there is sufficient reason to believe that a pattern and practice of sexual abuse is occurring in the facility. The bill would specify penalties for agencies, departments, and companies that are delinquent for or fail an audit. Because this bill would require a higher level of service from county and local correctional facilities, it would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 21, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (August 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1019.) (May 23).
upper
May 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 757.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 716
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 716. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline