Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement: qualified escrow funds.
Summary
Under existing law, states' attorneys general and various tobacco product manufacturers have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) , in settlement of various lawsuits, that provides for the allocation of money to the states and certain territories. Existing law requires a tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer, as defined, and generally perform its financial obligations under the MSA, or to place specified amounts into a qualified escrow fund, which are calculated on a per unit sold basis, as specified. For each tobacco product manufacturer that places amounts into a qualified escrow fund, existing law requires that manufacturer to certify to the Attorney General that the manufacturer has complied with existing law, and the failure to place all required funds into escrow subjects the manufacturer to civil penalties, as specified. This bill would, for the purposes of calculating the amount a tobacco product manufacturer is required to place in the qualified escrow fund, revise the definition of "units sold" to specify that it means the number of cigarettes sold to a consumer, regardless of whether the state excise tax was due or collected, but would exclude, among other things, cigarettes sold at federal military installations.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jun 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Aug 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Aug 27, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 20, 2013 · Assembly Aug 5, 2013
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
May 20, 2013
D
Democratic28
92% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Aug 27, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 5, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-6)
assembly
Jun 25, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 20, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
senate
May 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 852.) (May 7).
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 680
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 680. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline