California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: residential infill projects.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act, commonly referred to as CEQA, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts from these requirements residential infill projects meeting specified criteria, including, among other things, that a community-level environmental review was adopted or certified within 5 years of the date that the application for the project is deemed complete and the project promotes higher density infill housing. For the purposes of this exemption, CEQA defines "residential" to include a use consisting of residential units and primarily neighborhood-serving goods, services, or retail uses that do not exceed 15% of the total floor area of the project. This bill would instead exempt as "residential" a use consisting of residential units and primarily neighborhood-serving goods, services, or retail uses that do not exceed 25% of the total building square footage of the project. (2) Because this bill would require a lead agency to determine whether a project meets the above criteria to qualify for an exemption from CEQA, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
Jan 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Sep 25, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly Aug 14, 2014
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 34
Jan 23, 2014
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican9
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Sep 25, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 14, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-1)
assembly
Aug 7, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 6).
lower
Jun 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 12, 2014
Committee
Assembly Rule 56 (pending re-referral to L. Gov.) suspended. (Page 5488.)
lower
May 8, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. GOV.
lower
Jan 23, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-5)
senate
Jan 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jan 16, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2615.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 9, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 6, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 674
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 674. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline