CalFresh: eligibility: guidelines.
Summary
Existing federal law provides for the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) , under which nutrition assistance benefits are allocated to each state by the federal government. Under existing state law, the CalFresh program, California's federal allocation is distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law requires that the eligibility of households be determined to the extent permitted by federal law, and requires the State Department of Social Services to establish a program of categorical eligibility for CalFresh in accordance with federal law. Existing law requires each county welfare department to carry out the local administrative responsibilities of this program, subject to the supervision of the department and to rules and regulations adopted by the department. This bill would require the department to issue guidance to simplify the verification of dependent care expense deductions necessary to determine a household's eligibility for, or the benefit level of, CalFresh. The bill would require that the guidance establish that dependent care expenses shall be considered verified upon receipt of a self-certified statement of monthly dependent care expenses, unless federal law requires, or the county human services agency requests, additional documentation, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to implement these provisions by all-county letters or similar instructions until regulations are adopted, and would require the department to adopt regulations on or before January 1, 2015.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Oct 4, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Sep 3, 2013
How they voted
31–5
Passed
Total votes 36
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican9
55% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Oct 4, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 2137.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 3, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-20-1)
assembly
Sep 3, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 21).
lower
Aug 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-5)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1018.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 486.) (April 9).
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 672
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 672. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline