Local government: redevelopment: revenues from property tax override rates.
Summary
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires revenues equivalent to those that would have been allocated to each redevelopment agency, had the agency not been dissolved, to be allocated to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund of each successor agency for making payments on the principal of and interest on loans, and moneys advanced to or indebtedness incurred by the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires, from February 1, 2012, to July 1, 2012, inclusive, and for each fiscal year thereafter, the county auditor-controller, after deducting administrative costs, to allocate property tax revenues in each Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund in a specified manner. This bill, for the 2014–15 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, would prohibit any revenues derived from the imposition of a property tax rate, approved by the voters of a city, county, or city and county to make payments in support of pension programs and levied in addition to the general property tax rate, from being allocated to a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund and would, instead, require these revenues be allocated to, and when collected to be paid into, the fund of the city, county, or city and county whose voters approved the tax unless, following a written request with each Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule cycle from the successor agency to the city, county, or city and county whose voters approved the tax, the city, county, or city and county authorizes the use of the revenues by the successor agency to pay any enforceable obligation, as specified. The bill would require any revenues derived from the imposition of a property tax rate as so described that have been pledged as security for the payment of any indebtedness obligation to be allocated to the successor agency to pay that indebtedness obligation, as specified. The bill would require all allocations of revenues derived from the imposition of a property tax rate as so described made by any county auditor-controller prior to July 1, 2014, to be deemed correct, and would prohibit any city, county, city and county, county auditor-controller, successor agency, or affected taxing entity from being subject to any claim, as specified. By adding to the duties of local government officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
Jan 2014
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Jan 28, 2014
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Jan 28, 2014
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican9
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Aug 6, 2014
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 23, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 19, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96(a).
lower
Jun 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 8, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 28, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Jan 27, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 2645.) (January 23).
upper
Jan 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 2591.) (January 14).
upper
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 6, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.
upper
Apr 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 663
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 663. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline