Environmental quality: archaeological resources: qualifications.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act, referred to as CEQA, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on archaeological resources. CEQA requires the Office of Planning and Research to prepare, develop, and review on a biennial basis, and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt, guidelines for the implementation of CEQA. This bill would require the office, on its next review of the guidelines, to prepare and develop proposed changes and amendments to the guidelines to establish standards for proper archaeological evaluation conducted for the purposes of CEQA.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
May 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
Held in committee and under submission.
upper
May 7, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 789.) (May 1).
upper
Apr 18, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Apr 10, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 659
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 659. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline