Fair Employment and Housing Act: unlawful practices.
Summary
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, protects and safeguards the right and opportunity of all persons to seek, obtain, and hold employment, participate in a labor organization, and participate in employment training or apprenticeship programs without discrimination or abridgment on account of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, or sexual orientation. Existing law authorizes a person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice under these provisions to file a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and authorizes the department to bring a civil action on the behalf of the person in the case of a failure to eliminate an unlawful practice under these provisions. This bill would provide that, in a claim of discrimination or retaliation under these provisions, the person claiming to have been aggrieved shall prevail if he or she has proven that a protected characteristic or activity was a substantial motivating factor, as defined, in the employment action or decision. If an employer pleads and proves that it would have made the same employment action or decision at the same time, without considering the protected characteristic or activity, the remedies available to the employee would be limited as specified. In addition, if an employer pleads and proves that it would have made the same employment action or decision at the same time without considering the protected characteristic or activity, the bill would authorize injunctive relief and attorney's and expert's fees against the employer and would require a specified civil penalty to be paid by that employer to the employee.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Vetoed Oct 10, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Sep 12, 2013
How they voted
21–13
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 39
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic28
75% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Feb 27, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 10, 2013
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 10, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 12, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-25)
assembly
Sep 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 11. Page 2430.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 9, 2013
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Sep 6, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (August 13).
lower
Aug 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 10, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-13-5)
senate
Apr 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 663.) (April 23).
upper
Apr 15, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 3, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roderick Wright
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 655
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 655. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline