SB 614 California Senate · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Local government: jurisdictional changes: infrastructure financing.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, provides the authority and procedures for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization of cities and districts. The act requires a local agency or school district that initiates proceedings for a change of local government organization or reorganization by submitting a resolution of application to a local agency formation commission to also submit a plan for providing services within the affected territory, as specified. This bill would instead require, if a proposal for a change of organization or reorganization is submitted to a local commission, that the applicant submit a plan for providing services within the affected territory that, until January 1, 2025, in the case of a change of organization or reorganization initiated by a local agency that includes a disadvantaged, unincorporated community, authorizes a local agency to include in its resolution of application an annexation development plan to improve or upgrade structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other infrastructure to serve the disadvantaged, unincorporated community. This bill would authorize the local agency formation commission to approve the proposal to include the formation of a special district or reorganization of a special district, as specified. This bill would require an annexation plan to include certain information. (2) Existing law requires a county auditor, in the case of a jurisdictional change caused by the formation of a district, to adjust the allocation of property tax revenue pursuant to the agreement of local agencies whose service area or service responsibility would be altered by the jurisdictional change, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2025, authorize a local agency that files a resolution of application for change of organization, and one or more other local agencies that will improve or upgrade structures to serve a disadvantaged, unincorporated community, to agree on an annexation development plan for financing services and structures that may provide that taxes, levied upon taxable property in the area included within the territory each year by or for the benefit of the local agency and one or more other local agencies that consent to the plan, be divided as specified. This bill would require the plan to include a date on which that division of taxes shall terminate, and would allow the plan to provide for the issuance of indebtedness, as specified. The bill would prohibit any plan developed under these provisions from including any portion of a redevelopment project area, as specified, or resulting in a reduction of property tax revenues to school entities.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
Apr 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 22, 2013 Signed Sep 29, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Apr 8, 2013 · Assembly Aug 20, 2014

How they voted

2310
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
Apr 8, 2013
D Democratic25
23 Yea 1 Nay 1
92% Yea
R Republican9
9 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
11
Committee
14
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 4822.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)
upper
Aug 21, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4676.) Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Aug 21, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 20, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-20-1)
assembly
Aug 20, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 16, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 12, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 12, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96(a).
lower
Jun 9, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Aug 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 4, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 16, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 8, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-10-1)
senate
Apr 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 406.) (April 3).
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors