Franchises.
Summary
The California Franchise Relations Act sets forth certain requirements related to the termination, nonrenewal, and transfer of franchises between a franchisor, subfranchisor, and franchisee, as those terms are defined. Existing law provides that any condition purporting to bind any person to waive compliance with the act is contrary to public policy and void. This bill would provide that a condition of a franchise agreement requiring the franchisee to waive the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is contrary to public policy and void. The bill would prohibit a franchise agreement from restricting the right of a franchisee to join or participate in an association of franchisees to the extent the restriction is prohibited by existing law. The bill would prohibit a franchise agreement from preventing a franchisee from selling or transferring a franchise or a part of the interest of a franchise to another person, except as provided. The bill would prohibit a franchise agreement from giving a franchisee a right to sell, transfer, or assign the franchise, or a right thereunder, without the consent of the franchisor, as provided. The bill would prohibit a franchise agreement from allowing the transferring franchisee to fail to notify the franchisor of the franchisee's decision to sell, transfer, or assign the franchise, as provided. Existing law prohibits a franchisor from terminating a franchise agreement prior to the expiration of its term, except for good cause, as defined, and upon the occurrence of specified events. This bill would prohibit a franchisor from terminating a franchise agreement prior to the expiration of its term unless there is a substantial and material breach on the part of the franchisee of a lawful requirement of the franchise agreement, except as otherwise provided. Existing law requires a franchisor that terminates or fails to renew a franchise, other than in accordance with specified provisions of law, to offer to repurchase from the franchisee the franchisee's resalable current inventory, as specified. This bill would require a franchisor that terminates or fails to allow the sale, transfer, or assignment of a franchise, other than in accordance with specified provisions of law, to, at the election of the franchisee, either reinstate the franchisee and pay specified damages or pay to the franchisee the fair market value of the franchise and franchise assets, as provided.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Vetoed Sep 29, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2013 · Assembly Aug 14, 2014
How they voted
20–11
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
May 28, 2013
D
Democratic27
70% Yea
R
Republican9
77% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2014
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 29, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 9. Page 4732.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 14, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-24-9)
assembly
Aug 14, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (June 24).
lower
Jun 10, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 20, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 18).
lower
Jun 10, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and B.,P. & C.P.
lower
May 28, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-11-5)
senate
Apr 17, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 567.) (April 16).
upper
Apr 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Hannah-Beth Jackson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 610
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 610. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline