Interrogation: electronic recordation.
Summary
Existing law provides that under specified conditions the statements of witnesses, victims, or perpetrators of specified crimes may be recorded and preserved by means of videotape. This bill would require the electronic recordation of the entire custodial interrogation of a minor who is in a fixed place of detention, as defined, and who, at the time of the interrogation, is suspected of committing or accused of committing murder. The bill would set forth various exceptions from this requirement, including if the law enforcement officer conducting the interrogation or his or her superior reasonably believes that electronic recording would disclose the identity of a confidential informant or jeopardize the safety of an officer, the individual being interrogated, or another individual. The bill would require the prosecution to show by clear and convincing evidence that an exception applies to justify the failure to make that electronic recording. The bill would also require the interrogating entity to maintain the original or an exact copy of an electronic recording made of the interrogation until the final conclusion of the proceedings, as specified. The bill would require the court to provide jury instructions to be developed by the Judicial Council if the court finds that a defendant was subjected to a custodial interrogation in violation of the above-mentioned provisions. The bill would make these provisions applicable to juvenile court proceedings, as specified. By imposing these new requirements on local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Oct 13, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Sep 11, 2013
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 13, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2424.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-1-1)
assembly
Sep 11, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 21, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1016.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 468.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 569
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 569. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline