University of California: bidding requirements.
Summary
Existing law requires the Regents of the University of California, except as specified, to let any contract for a project to the lowest responsible bidder. Existing law also provides that where the Regents of the University of California are of the view that a project of $100,000 or less does not require the application of all provisions of law relating to competitive bidding by the university, the regents shall solicit bids in writing and award the work to the lowest responsible bidder or reject all bids. This bill would raise this dollar threshold for the cost of a project to $640,000. The bill would require the Regents of the University of California, with respect to projects that do not require the application of all competitive bidding provisions, to establish a procedure to qualify and rate a bidder for work to be awarded when the cost of the project exceeds $300,000 but does not exceed $640,000, as specified. The bill would also require each campus or facility to publicly post a brief description of the project, the awarded amount, and contractor's name.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Signed Sep 16, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2014 · Assembly Aug 19, 2014
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Aug 20, 2014
D
Democratic26
84% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 16, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-6)
senate
Aug 20, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4641.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 19, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-16-4)
assembly
Aug 19, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 2, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (July 2).
lower
Jun 25, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 11, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
Aug 7, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
May 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
May 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
May 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 787.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 502
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 502. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline