Public utilities: research and development projects.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, gas corporations, heat corporations, and telephone corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law authorizes electrical corporations, gas corporations, heat corporations, and telephone corporations to voluntarily adopt certain research and development programs and authorizes the commission to allow inclusion of expenses for research and development in rates. Existing law requires the commission to consider specified guidelines in evaluating the research, development, and demonstration programs proposed by electrical corporations and gas corporations. Beginning at an unspecified date, this bill would require that findings supporting a decision to approve the inclusion of expenses incurred for research and development projects or programs in electricity rates be informed by independent expert review, as defined. The bill would require the commission by February 1, 2016, and by February 1 of every 3 years thereafter, to submit a report to the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature listing all research and development projects where the expenses of the project were or are recovered from ratepayers during the previous 3 years, including for each project the citations of all published papers, all oral and poster presentations given at public meetings, and all patents awarded for the funded research.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2014
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 19, 2012
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 24, 2013
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
May 24, 2013
D
Democratic28
89% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Jun 23, 2014
Committee
Set, final hearing. Failed passage in committee.
lower
Jun 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 24, 2014
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Jun 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
May 24, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
May 20, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 7, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 750.) (April 30).
upper
Apr 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jan 10, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Dec 19, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 48
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 48. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline