Human trafficking.
Summary
Existing law, as amended by Proposition 21, as approved by the voters at the March 7, 2000, statewide primary election, provides that any person who actively participates in any criminal street gang with knowledge that its members engage in or have engaged in a pattern of criminal gang activity, and who willfully promotes, furthers, or assists in any felonious criminal conduct by members of that gang, shall be punished, as specified. Existing law defines "a pattern of criminal gang activity" as the commission of, attempted commission of, conspiracy to commit, or solicitation of, sustained juvenile petition for, or conviction of, 2 or more listed offenses. Proposition 21 may be amended by a statute passed by a 23 vote of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would add human trafficking as an offense that may be used to establish a pattern of criminal gang activity. Because this bill would amend Proposition 21, the bill requires a 23 vote. Because this bill would change the definition of a crime and require a higher level of service from local prosecutors in pleading and proving the enhancement, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also correct cross-references and make conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Vetoed Sep 28, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Aug 11, 2014
How they voted
36–0
Passed
Total votes 36
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2014
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 28, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 13, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4469.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 11, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 11, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 27, 2013
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 26, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1014.) (May 23).
upper
May 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 666.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Co
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Co
Rocky J. Chávez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 473
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 473. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline