Sentencing.
Summary
Existing law provides that most felonies are punishable by a triad of terms of incarceration in the state prison, comprised of low, middle, and upper terms. Previous law that required the court to impose the middle term, unless there were circumstances in aggravation or mitigation of the crime, was amended to provide that the choice of the appropriate term rests within the sound discretion of the court. Existing provisions related to sentence enhancements involving criminal street gang activity, firearms, and sentencing generally, operative until January 1, 2014, specify that the appropriate term rests within the sound discretion of the court. Existing law, operative on and after January 1, 2014, instead requires the court to impose the middle term, unless there are circumstances in mitigation or aggravation of the crime. This bill would extend to January 1, 2017, the provisions of law that provide that the court shall, in its discretion, impose the term or enhancement that best serves the interests of justice. The bill would also make conforming changes. This bill would amend Proposition 21, an initiative statute adopted by the voters at the March 7, 2000, statewide primary election that provides that its provisions may be amended by the Legislature by a 23 vote of the membership of each house, and therefore requires a 23 vote.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 21, 2013
Signed Oct 3, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2013 · Assembly Sep 11, 2013
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 29, 2013
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 3, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0)
assembly
Sep 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2380.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 26, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 29, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1014.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 390.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 463
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 463. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline