Surplus residential property.
Summary
Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to preserve, upgrade, and expand the supply of housing to persons and families of low or moderate income, through the sale of specified surplus residential property owned by public agencies. Existing law establishes priorities and procedures that any state agency disposing of that surplus residential property is required to follow, and defines relevant terms for these purposes, including "fair market value." This bill would revise the definition of "fair market value" for purposes of the sale of this surplus residential property, to reflect the existing "as is" condition of the property, taking into account any needed repairs. Existing law requires specified single-family residences to be first offered to their present occupants, at an affordable price, as defined. Under existing law, the selling agency has the option of making repairs to the property required by lenders or government assistance programs, or providing the occupants with a replacement dwelling, pursuant to a specified provision of law. This bill would revise the procedures applicable to the sale of these surplus residential properties not otherwise sold pursuant to existing procedures, to be offered to current and former tenants in good standing, respectively, and to purchasers who will be owner occupants. The bill additionally would require the selling agency to offer tenants in good standing of nonresidential properties to be given priority to purchase the property they occupy. The bill would authorize the Department of Transportation to offer a residence or property in an "as is" condition, at the request of a person with priority to purchase the residence or property in accordance with existing law. This bill would require proceeds from sales of surplus residential property to be placed in the SR-710 Rehabilitation Account, created by the bill, and would continuously appropriate these funds for the purpose of providing specified repairs to the properties until the last of the properties is repaired, at which time the funds, less any reimbursements due to the federal government, would be transferred to the State Highway Account, for allocation by the California Transportation Commission, as specified. This bill would provide that the preliminary project alternative referred to as Alternative F-6 in the December 2012 Alternative Analysis Report of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority shall no longer be deemed a feasible alternative for consideration in any state environmental review process for the Interstate 710 North Gap Closure project, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Signed Oct 1, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Sep 6, 2013
How they voted
36–0
Passed
Total votes 36
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
14
Committee
14
Amendments
2
Oct 1, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2279.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 6, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-2)
assembly
Sep 6, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 6, 2013
Introduced
Amendments by Assembly Member Morrell tabled on motion by Assembly Member Atkins. (Ayes 51. Noes 25. Page 2957.)
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 21, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 13, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 7, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jun 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Jun 17, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and TRANS.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0)
senate
May 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1013.) (May 23).
upper
May 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 667.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 17, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Co
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 416
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 416. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline