Horse racing: distribution of proceeds.
Summary
Existing law requires each licensed racing association to designate a certain number of racing days to be conducted as charity days, and requires the net proceeds from those charity days to be distributed to beneficiaries who meet certain qualifications. Existing law also requires distributions to be made to certain nonprofit corporations and organizations, and requires that at least 20% of the distributions go to charities associated with the horse racing industry. This bill, in addition to those required distributions, would authorize a separate distribution to be made to a nonprofit corporation or trust that has as its sole purpose the support of recognized fairs or the network of California fairs. Existing law requires that the total percentage deducted from wagers at satellite wagering facilities in the northern zone be the same as deductions for wagers at the racetrack where the racing meeting is being conducted. Existing law, until December 31, 2013, requires a certain amount to be distributed to a specified organization formed to operate the audiovisual signal system, with the mutual consent of the racing association, the organization representing the horsemen participating in the meeting, and the California Horse Racing Board, and, beginning January 1, 2014, provides for a distribution for those purposes in accordance with a revised method of calculation. This bill would extend those dates from December 31, 2013, to December 31, 2016, and from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2017, respectively.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Vetoed Oct 10, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2013 · Assembly Sep 12, 2013
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Sep 13, 2013
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Feb 27, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 10, 2013
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 10, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 13, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-1)
senate
Sep 12, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0)
assembly
Sep 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2436.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 12, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (September 11).
lower
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 15, 2013
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 16, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 465.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 398
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 398. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline