Wiretapping: authorization.
Summary
Existing law establishes a procedure for a prosecutor to apply for, and the court to issue, an order authorizing law enforcement to intercept a wire or electronic communication. Existing law requires the Attorney General to prepare and submit an annual report to the Legislature, the Judicial Council, and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts regarding these interceptions, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions punishable as a misdemeanor or as a felony. Existing law makes these provisions effective until January 1, 2015. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2020. By extending the operation of provisions of law creating a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
Jan 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Dec 4, 2012
Signed Sep 28, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly Aug 25, 2014
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 35
Jan 28, 2014
D
Democratic26
84% Yea
R
Republican9
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
11
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4870.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 25, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 14).
lower
Jun 18, 2014
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 11, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 24, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 28, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-6)
senate
Jan 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 2644.) (January 23).
upper
Jan 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 2590.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 9, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 6, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 22, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 564.) (April 16).
upper
Jan 10, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and ED.
upper
Dec 4, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 35
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 35. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline