SB 342 California Senate · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Foster children: social worker: visits.

Summary
Existing law requires that all foster children who are placed in group homes by county welfare departments or county probation departments be visited at least monthly by a county social worker or probation officer, and that each visit include a private discussion between the foster child and the county social worker or probation officer that is not held in the presence or immediate vicinity of the group home staff. Existing law also requires a county social worker or probation officer to make a regular visit with a child in any licensed, certified, or approved foster home, and requires that the visit include a private discussion between the foster child and the social worker or probation officer that is not held in the presence or immediate vicinity of the foster parent or caregiver. This bill would require that the location of monthly visits for each foster child who is placed in a group home or a licensed, certified, or approved foster home by a county welfare department or a county probation department comply with specified federal requirements. The bill would prohibit more than 2 consecutive monthly visits from being held outside the residence of the foster child and, if the visit does not occur in the place of residence, would require the social worker or probation officer to document in the case file and in the court report the location of the visit and the reason for the visit occurring outside the place of residence. The bill would also require the social worker or probation officer to advise the foster child that he or she has the right to request that the private discussion occur outside the group home or foster home. The bill would provide, however, that if a foster child requests to have the private discussion outside the group home or foster home, that private discussion shall not replace the visit in the group home or foster home. The bill would also provide that the social worker or probation officer shall not be required to schedule an additional visit to accommodate the request. By imposing additional duties on county employees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 20, 2013 Signed Oct 2, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2013 · Assembly Sep 9, 2013

How they voted

350
Passed
Total votes 35
May 29, 2013
D Democratic26
26 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 2, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2288.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0)
assembly
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 14, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
May 29, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
May 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1012.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 485.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Leland Yee
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
CA
8