Law enforcement: anti-reproductive-rights crimes.
Summary
Existing law, the Reproductive Rights Law Enforcement Act, requires the Attorney General to assume specified duties relating to planning, information gathering, and analysis with respect to anti-reproductive-rights crimes, as defined, including consultation with specified subject matter experts. Existing law also requires the convening of an advisory committee that is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of existing law. Existing law requires the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to develop an optional course of training for law enforcement agencies regarding anti-reproductive-rights crimes, as specified. Existing law provides for the repeal of these provisions as of January 1, 2014. This bill would make existing law operative indefinitely. Because the bill would extend the operative date of provisions that would impose reporting requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jul 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Sep 2013
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Signed Sep 9, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 13, 2013 · Assembly Aug 26, 2013
How they voted
24–6
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
May 13, 2013
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican9
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Sep 9, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-19-4)
assembly
Jul 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 24, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 13, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-6-5)
senate
May 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 816.) (May 6).
upper
Apr 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 666.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 28, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Hannah-Beth Jackson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 340
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 340. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline